« Eye Rakis in ActionHasta La Health Plan, Baby »

Beware of Mullahs Talking Peace

Khamenei reportedly wants to reign in Ahmadinejad and put a more moderate team in charge of nuke talks, to reduce tensions, stop the economic damage. UK Observer.  Khamenei, we are told, is not expected to see out the year, so what he wants is not so relevant.  This issue won’t be resolved until Iran’s power struggle is resolved. 

And even then, the mullahs in Iran are to be trusted on nukes about as much as the mullah in Iraq … al-Sadr, who says he wants to rejoin the government now that the heat is on.  But his army still needs to be destroyed. He and his henchmen need to be arrested for conspiracy to commit murder, which may help provoke his vanishing army into action.

Topics: Uncategorized

  Posted by Jules Crittenden at 12:37 am Comments (4) on Tuesday, January 23, 2007

4 Responses to “Beware of Mullahs Talking Peace”

1. saltydog Says:
   January 23rd, 2007 at 4:46 am

   Yep. They’ll snap to–for the next five minutes, or until Bush leaves the White House. Whichever comes first.

   I’d say that al-Sadr had his chance and blew it. It is way past time to remove him from the scene. Permanently.

2. Cliff Clavin Says:
   January 23rd, 2007 at 10:18 am

   Ahhh yes in both instances, the old Islamist ’shake your hand, piss on your leg at the same time’, trick.

   Persia’s economic problems, seemingly make Persia ripe for implosion. Those economic problems should exploited and agitated by whatever means necessary to bring that implosion to fruition, before the EXplosions become reality.

   This is the very thing that their brother in camel, Osama wanted to do, with his acts of war on the U.S.. Economically cripple and destroy the Great Satan and thereby cripple and destroy the Little Satan, Israel.

   Gotta be careful what you wish for Mullets, I mean Mullahs.

   Porky Sadr should have been filleted a couple of years ago but wasn’t ,for the sake of ‘Iraqi Unity’. Shame on us.

   What was and is needed in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as in general concerning Islamists, is not so much THE use of superior force’S, but the use of superior FORCE. Withering, unending, superior FORCE.

   But what do I know, I’m just a barfly in Boston.

3. The Thunder Run Says:
   January 23rd, 2007 at 10:22 am

   Web Reconnaissance for 01/23/2007

   A short recon of what’s out there that might draw your attention.

4. RebeccaH Says:
   January 23rd, 2007 at 11:28 am

   If we’ve learned nothing else, we should have learned by now that nothing an Islamicist says can be trusted. Absolutely nothing. So we should proceed on that premise and do what we’ve determined must be done.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.