Game Theory

John Hawks’ introductory lecture on the subject is relevant. Only problem, the games it describes are all symmetrical.  The games we are engaged in are not.  Except in strange ways.  Our strength of force, their ruthlessness; their weakness of force, our wavering political will. We need asymmetrical game theory.  Anyone know any?


Topics: GWOT, anthronerdism, science

  Posted by Jules Crittenden at 12:09 am Comments (2) on Monday, February 5, 2007

2 Responses to “Game Theory”

  1. JunkYardBlog Says:

    Chicken Run

    Jules Crittenden likes this explanation of game theory and thinks it’s applicable to the current war. Me, I’m not so sure. Game theory depends on a rational opponent. “Rational” is a complex concept: if you press it too far, it…

  2. dtes Says:

    Try this: http://www.gametheory.net/lectures/level.pl

    This seems relevant also: http://www.amazon.com/Game-Theory-Analysis-Roger-Myerson/dp/0674341163/sr=8-4/qid=1170731561/ref=pd_bbs_sr_4/102-7648073-3028156?ie=UTF8&s=books

Leave a Reply

Trackback URL

You must be logged in to post a comment.