Game Theory
John Hawks’ introductory lecture on the subject is relevant. Only problem, the games it describes are all symmetrical. The games we are engaged in are not. Except in strange ways. Our strength of force, their ruthlessness; their weakness of force, our wavering political will. We need asymmetrical game theory. Anyone know any?
Topics: anthronerdism, GWOT, science
Posted by Jules Crittenden at 12:09 am on Monday, February 5, 2007
2 Responses to “Game Theory”
Leave a Reply
Trackback URLYou must be logged in to post a comment.
rx pills online natural tenuate where to buy purchase levitra online cialis cheap Triarese ed pharmacy order diazepam visit your doctor online cheapest valium price buy viagra klipal mail order purchase xanax online female lorazepam cream which works better oxazepam or oxazepam women does zyban work cialis soft tabs women buy cheap viagra oils for female viagra female uk cialis buy discount levitra online uk levitra discount viagra soft tabs online porn movies mexico pharmacy generic viagra soft tabs generic levitra cheapest purchase cialis herbal cialis soft tabs drugstore canada online pharmacy viagra on line cialis natural levitra buy online pharmacy viagra cialis order best price for generic cialis soft tabs viagra soft tabs female opinion order viagra prescription

February 5th, 2007 at 6:24 pm
Chicken Run
Jules Crittenden likes this explanation of game theory and thinks it’s applicable to the current war. Me, I’m not so sure. Game theory depends on a rational opponent. “Rational” is a complex concept: if you press it too far, it…
February 5th, 2007 at 10:13 pm
Try this: http://www.gametheory.net/lectures/level.pl
This seems relevant also: http://www.amazon.com/Game-Theory-Analysis-Roger-Myerson/dp/0674341163/sr=8-4/qid=1170731561/ref=pd_bbs_sr_4/102-7648073-3028156?ie=UTF8&s=books