Game Theory
John Hawks’ introductory lecture on the subject is relevant. Only problem, the games it describes are all symmetrical. The games we are engaged in are not. Except in strange ways. Our strength of force, their ruthlessness; their weakness of force, our wavering political will. We need asymmetrical game theory. Anyone know any?
Topics: GWOT, anthronerdism, science
Posted by Jules Crittenden at 12:09 am on Monday, February 5, 2007
2 Responses to “Game Theory”
Leave a Reply
Trackback URLYou must be logged in to post a comment.

February 5th, 2007 at 6:24 pm
Chicken Run
Jules Crittenden likes this explanation of game theory and thinks it’s applicable to the current war. Me, I’m not so sure. Game theory depends on a rational opponent. “Rational” is a complex concept: if you press it too far, it…
February 5th, 2007 at 10:13 pm
Try this: http://www.gametheory.net/lectures/level.pl
This seems relevant also: http://www.amazon.com/Game-Theory-Analysis-Roger-Myerson/dp/0674341163/sr=8-4/qid=1170731561/ref=pd_bbs_sr_4/102-7648073-3028156?ie=UTF8&s=books