Moms of Fury, Day of Rage
Fury Mom to Dem Cong:
“If we had a Congress like this in World War II, we’d be having this conversation in German.”
“Not just ’support the troops, support the troops’ … we stand up and say we support the soldiers and we support their mission.”
“We do it because it has to be done.”
More engaged, responsible citizenship here. (h/t Instapundit)
Posted by Jules Crittenden at 1:04 pm on Sunday, April 8, 2007
14 Responses to “Moms of Fury, Day of Rage”
Leave a Reply
Trackback URLYou must be logged in to post a comment.
April 8th, 2007 at 2:12 pm
This story is all over the MSM, right? Just like Ma Cindy?
April 8th, 2007 at 5:59 pm
How about a call to support all government workers trying to do a bit of good?
It would probably appeal to a larger audience.
April 8th, 2007 at 6:19 pm
No alfie, those government workers are all a bunch of murdering scum. We should spit on them when they come home……wait…….they are home. Well we should spit on them at the office. Are you one?
April 8th, 2007 at 6:30 pm
I loved the woman in the coat with the fur trim. She was the most sensible straightforward person there. If you happen to know who she is Jules I would love for you to tell her to keep up the fight. Hopefully somehow she can get on the news stations and be a major counterpoint to Cindy S.
April 8th, 2007 at 6:58 pm
It’s too late for straw men if you guys want to save your government program in Iraq, MikeH.
Gotta come up with some actual, rational reasons why we should keep pumping $100+ billion a year into that failed bit of lefty social engineering.
April 8th, 2007 at 7:38 pm
folks, ignore the alphtard. You will never get past the non-sequitors, one liners, and nonsense.
April 8th, 2007 at 8:44 pm
non sequitor meaning, of course, a truth the pro war crowd doesn’t want to face.
Give us an endless supply of government money but don’t judge our results is the usual way lefties try to operate their welfare programs that aren’t working.
April 8th, 2007 at 9:23 pm
but don’t judge our results is the usual way lefties try to operate their welfare programs that aren’t working.
Were that the case, Iraq would be given about 70 years before being declared in trouble…and even then it would be open for debate.
April 8th, 2007 at 10:14 pm
I learned yesterday that the ant that scurries across this blog has a blog of his own! It’s named Alphavictim. heeheeehehheee That’s right, the number one victim. hahahahahaharhaha He brags! He boasts! “I’m a victim! Not just any victim, either–I am the FIRST victim!”
Sorry heheheee I know this is hahahha OT hahahahaheeee, I just can’t help it. HAHAHAHAWHAWHAWHAWHAHAHAHA The ant finally gave me my laugh of the day, and I find that I just keep on laughing. I wasn’t going to say anything here, but then I saw him attempt to use the term “strawman,” as in a strawman argument. I bet he looked it up. Too bad he hasn’t a clue what the definition actually means. Alphavictim. It’s the first time I’ve seen make an unvarnished statement, and it’s about himself.
God, he’s the gift that keeps on giving, that one is.
April 8th, 2007 at 10:17 pm
non-sequitur:
1. Logic. an inference or a conclusion that does not follow from the premises.
2. A statement containing an illogical conclusion.
As I said: ignore the alphtard.
April 8th, 2007 at 10:21 pm
Yeah, saltydog, I’ve seen his blog…..it’s pretty pathetic. alphtard may be a victim, but he’s a victim of his own “thinking”. Or, in this case, the lack of thinking.
Unlike those people in New Hampshire, who in fact offer well thought out comments, statements, and arguments. It’s good to know that non-sequiturs aren’t the standard means of discourse in this country.
April 9th, 2007 at 5:43 am
What ever will you guys do when a New Yorker takes over the White House in 2009 and ends your rodeo?
April 9th, 2007 at 9:40 am
Heh! Thank you, alphtard.
April 9th, 2007 at 10:57 pm
“What ever will you guys do when a New Yorker takes over the White House in 2009 and ends your rodeo?”
Rejoice that some dipwad from California didn’t get the vote.