« Illegration SiAgainstism »

Boobs Exposed

UPDATE: Margery, What’s up with Hill’s face? 

Boston Herald’s Margery Eagan on Boobs of the Right. 2008 Presidential hopeful boobage.  Would-be First Boobs. 

Here’s a Boob of the Left, who says I’m sexist because after taking her seriously as a professional woman by mocking her idiotic views on terrorism, I mocked her for promoting herself with a significant part of one boob.*  I neglected to properly mock her for promoting herself with an homage to an entire life of come-hither exhibitionism.  My oversight.    

Welcome Sparkypuppypuddlers!  How come everyone’s so fascinated with boobs? Well, if you enjoyed your sense of moral indignation over this one, you’ll love your  righteous wrath over this, and this.  Here’s a tribute to one of yours. Truly a great loss to American political thought. But I’m scratching my head trying to figure where lefties will fall on this.  It was absurd to begin with, and now its ridiculous. Could be right up your alley.  Hey, I’m liking that naughty riding crop thing at the top of your doggie site! Behave!

Further exploration of issues related to boobs and politics, in case you’re interested.  And if you’ve got this far, you know you are.

* If there are any other idiot lefty bloggers out there promoting themselves with their chests, male or female, please let me know. I’ll mock them, too. 

FYI commenters: Certain words trigger spam controls and require moderation. This post may prompt some of them. Be patient.

Topics: boobs, moronocy, shameless self-promotion

  Posted by Jules Crittenden at 8:30 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2007

25 Responses to “Boobs Exposed”

1. drbearma Says:
   June 5th, 2007 at 9:43 am

   I don’t want to sound sexist, but was “she” always a woman? Some of those pictures on her site look like “she” may have been a “he” at one point in time.

2. The_Real_JeffS Says:
   June 5th, 2007 at 9:49 am

   I’ll mock them, too.

   Way to go, Jules! Keep on being equal opprotunity!

3. Mgmax Says:
   June 5th, 2007 at 11:04 am

   “I mocked her for promoting herself with a significant part of one boob”

   On a page on which she herself mocks her younger self quite a bit… but is apparently quite humorless when it comes to her middle-aged self hanging out of her power suit.

4. El Cid Says:
   June 5th, 2007 at 11:54 am

   Her head (no, no, the real one) tossed back in Loretta Young fashion, as if the rest of the world is a mere, nuisance and then I see this….

   I guess Jules has trouble with good looking women talking above his head

   This bitch wants you Jules…I mean she really wants a good., sweaty..ummmm, never mind.

5. RebeccaH Says:
   June 5th, 2007 at 12:26 pm

   I long ago identified a certain class of women who display the cleavage in order to distract from the face. Not pointing any fingers, mind you.

6. Bandit Says:
   June 5th, 2007 at 12:33 pm

   has trouble with good looking women talking above his head

   Right above my little head

7. Mr. Johnson Says:
   June 5th, 2007 at 12:43 pm

   Taylor Marsh’s site must be awesome since it’s blocked by my corporate internet overlords as pr0n. Damn corporate internet overlords. I demand freedom for the boobage!

8. El Cid Says:
   June 5th, 2007 at 1:06 pm

   Her site is soooooo, humdrum.

   My suggestion would be rename the site, to say….Titters From the Left.

9. drbearma Says:
   June 5th, 2007 at 2:59 pm

   You know, in some of the pictures of her on her web site, it sort of looks like she may have been a he at some point in time.

10. saltydog Says:
    June 5th, 2007 at 4:15 pm

    Oh no. You guys get it all wrong. This whole thing is because she is right about the JFK non-plot by non-terrorists. Since Jules won’t admit that, he’s a sexist. See how that works? No? Neither do I.

    Is she making fun of stupid people? Isn’t that against some progressive rule or other? What about these terrorists’ self-esteem? Someone ought to ’splain to Mz Boob that just because a terrorist fails, doesn’t mean that he can’t aspire to jihad as much any Islamist. Does she only respect terrorists who succeed? Bigot.

11. saltydog Says:
    June 5th, 2007 at 4:27 pm

    Oh dear. I think I triggered something or other. Sorry to take up your time Jules. (Just as long as you don’t look at me and say, “That’s 2.)

    About Mrs Thompson: I agree that she ought to show more discretion and less skin. Just her person already tells everyone that Fred has what it takes to catch a honey (money and fame). The question now is whether Fred (or any of the others) has the gravitas to be president.

12. Dave Surls Says:
    June 5th, 2007 at 4:29 pm

    “has trouble with good looking women talking above his head”

    1.) You aren’t very smart.

    2.) You aren’t particularly good looking.

    That being said, what people “have trouble” with isn’t the fact that you’re not very bright, or that you’re arrogant about your looks (without having any good reason to be), what people “have trouble” with is your casual attitude about terrorist plots given the fact that thousands of Americans have been killed in hundreds of different terror attacks over the last few decades.

    You might think terror plots are no big deal.

    We think it’s a real big deal. That’s because we actually care about our country and our countrymen.

13. Dave Surls Says:
    June 5th, 2007 at 6:01 pm

    “Provocative clothing always brings out the Neanderthal in men…”

    LOL. Another aging lefty hag with delusions of desirability. Honey, you were o.k. looking 30 years ago, maybe, but we’re not likely to be overcome with lust at the site of your semi-clad torso at this late date.

    It slays me when gals like her think that men are incapable of seeing them as sex objects, when just the opposite is the case.

14. The_Real_JeffS Says:
    June 5th, 2007 at 6:02 pm

    From the update link:

    Sadly, Rosie’s gone and nobody else dared admit what they were thinking.

    That says it all. Margery is a moonbat of the 32nd degree.

15. Dave Surls Says:
    June 5th, 2007 at 6:07 pm

    “Jules needs to spend more time in reality…”-Ms. Wannabe America

    Yeah, right. He’s actually been to Iraq, you on the other hand, have actually been in a beauty pageant.

    Her entire article is composed of one idiotic remark like that after another. This woman is a total airhead (even by lefty standards).

16. Jules Crittenden Says:
    June 5th, 2007 at 9:45 pm

    I’d just like to say she was right on one thing. Provocative clothing DOES bring out the Neanderthal in me. I’m fine with power brain women baring their parts but thought it was a tad immodest of her to describe herself “good-looking” and “talking above,” braggadocia not really being a Miss America trait.

17. El Cid Says:
    June 5th, 2007 at 10:44 pm

    UH, MY NAME, JULES..LETS FIND ROCK…LOL.

18. El Cid Says:
    June 5th, 2007 at 10:46 pm

    UH, FLAT ROCK

19. blogagog Says:
    June 5th, 2007 at 10:52 pm

    “I don’t want to sound sexist, but was “she” always a woman?”

    Did you ever laugh so hard it makes you cry? I just did.

20. Jules Crittenden Says:
    June 5th, 2007 at 11:29 pm

    WOMAN TALK OVER MY HEAD. BIG WORDS MAKE HEAD HURT. HEY LOOK, BOOB. BETTER NOW.

21. Dave Surls Says:
    June 5th, 2007 at 11:49 pm

    “she was right on one thing.”

    Yeah? I got a busted alarm clock that does that twice a day.

22. saltydog Says:
    June 6th, 2007 at 12:30 am

    That provocative clothing brings out the Neanderthal in men is something women count on. Including her. Making that statement is akin to saying that the sun rises in the East. So what?

23. El Cid Says:
    June 6th, 2007 at 9:03 am

    UH, WHAT IS SUN NEED. FLAT ROCK FOR BOOB PERSON. I FIND. SO WE DO WHAT TOGETHER.

24. Ed Driscoll.com Says:
    June 6th, 2007 at 11:13 am

    Boobage-A-Go-Go

    Plenty of boobs of all types exposed at Jules Crittenden’s Forward Cleavage, err, Forward Movement….

25. Boobing It « Michael P.F. van der Galiën Says:
    June 6th, 2007 at 11:47 am

    [...] Jun 6th, 2007 by mvdg At Forward Movement. [...]

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.