What Is It About Boobs?
Surber is all over the “bo-oms.” Talk about a hot-button issue.
The lefties get Freudian about boobs. This one wants you to admire (part of) hers, just don’t suggest might be (part of) one of her more worthy attributes.
Margery, of course, is fascinated by the boobs. But only the right boobs.
And so, after his own fashion, is Theo Spark, on a site devoted largely to boobs and politics.
So what is it about boobs and politics?
For some reason I don’t have any deep thoughts on this. I looked back into history, thought about Helen of Troy. You know, the face that launched a thousand ships. Or was it something else? Excuse me, what were we talking about?
Sorry, lost my train of thought. Anyway, here’s what happens when you google boobs and politics:
Everyone’s favorite Alabama gubernatorial candidate. That girl’s using her political capital.
Candidate calls for “less of these boobs.” Gets his wish. Article not available.
Liveblogging the GOP debate. Yep.
Who needs brains when you have boobs like these?
Righteous indignation over three-boob beer ad … in a “progressive magazine.”
There you have it. Party on.
Posted by Jules Crittenden at 10:53 am on Thursday, June 7, 2007
4 Responses to “What Is It About Boobs?”
Leave a Reply
Trackback URLYou must be logged in to post a comment.
June 7th, 2007 at 3:17 pm
http://www.nyssenate26.com/districts/26/images_WMS/itn313.jpg
NY state Senator Liz Krueger, D-Manhattan.
Ladies and gentlmen of the jury, I proudly rest my case. OINK!
June 7th, 2007 at 6:47 pm
You know what I find fascinating? All the Old Masters painted these big, hippy (in the original sense), Junoesque women, and every one of them had relatively small boobs. Why is that?
June 7th, 2007 at 7:15 pm
Did you scroll down Taylor Marsh’s blog to “I like knobs”? Could it be she’s casting sexist aspersions on body parts?
June 7th, 2007 at 8:08 pm
They had wives looking over their shoulders.
Cheers