<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shocking!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/07/26/shocking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/07/26/shocking/</link>
	<description>Forward Movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:07:20 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: corndog</title>
		<link>http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/07/26/shocking/comment-page-1/#comment-22511</link>
		<dc:creator>corndog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/07/26/shocking/#comment-22511</guid>
		<description>Salty,

Many thanks for your post.  The first half of your last paragraph is basically the point I was trying to make, and now I understand the point you were making earlier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salty,</p>
<p>Many thanks for your post.  The first half of your last paragraph is basically the point I was trying to make, and now I understand the point you were making earlier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saltydog</title>
		<link>http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/07/26/shocking/comment-page-1/#comment-22478</link>
		<dc:creator>saltydog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 08:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/07/26/shocking/#comment-22478</guid>
		<description>Corndog, sorry I didn&#039;t get back to you earlier.  I&#039;ve been a bit under the weather.  I would answer your question in detail, but honest to Pete, I can&#039;t bring myself to reread that boy&#039;s crap.  

A minor P.S.:  When I compared this jerk with our &quot;pet troll&quot; I was speaking of ant, not you.  They cannot breathe without sneering.  You, at least, seem to use your mind on occasion, and though completely capable of rehearsing the script, I do think that you do more than memorize the latest meme.  To me, you are misguided in your thinking, but you&#039;re not an idiot.

I won&#039;t stay quiet on Pat Tillman.  What happened to him was savage and a tragedy.  The way it was handled was criminal, and is being treated as such.  The way it ought to be.  As stupid as this Sir Scott person is, there is no comparison to be made.  There are bad people in the military, just as there are bad people in the general population from which they are spawned.  Surprisingly, there are fewer in the military, overall.  It is the constant focus on the rotten sociopaths in both sectors that bother me, and for the same reason.  Such focus by the media and entertainment industry makes it seem as though these mutants are the norm, or at least wide-spread through the population.  That isn&#039;t the truth.  I&#039;m sick to death of this view of mankind, frankly.  It ignores all the good in the world that makes life worth living and makes cynics of us all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corndog, sorry I didn&#8217;t get back to you earlier.  I&#8217;ve been a bit under the weather.  I would answer your question in detail, but honest to Pete, I can&#8217;t bring myself to reread that boy&#8217;s crap.  </p>
<p>A minor P.S.:  When I compared this jerk with our &#8220;pet troll&#8221; I was speaking of ant, not you.  They cannot breathe without sneering.  You, at least, seem to use your mind on occasion, and though completely capable of rehearsing the script, I do think that you do more than memorize the latest meme.  To me, you are misguided in your thinking, but you&#8217;re not an idiot.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t stay quiet on Pat Tillman.  What happened to him was savage and a tragedy.  The way it was handled was criminal, and is being treated as such.  The way it ought to be.  As stupid as this Sir Scott person is, there is no comparison to be made.  There are bad people in the military, just as there are bad people in the general population from which they are spawned.  Surprisingly, there are fewer in the military, overall.  It is the constant focus on the rotten sociopaths in both sectors that bother me, and for the same reason.  Such focus by the media and entertainment industry makes it seem as though these mutants are the norm, or at least wide-spread through the population.  That isn&#8217;t the truth.  I&#8217;m sick to death of this view of mankind, frankly.  It ignores all the good in the world that makes life worth living and makes cynics of us all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Surls</title>
		<link>http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/07/26/shocking/comment-page-1/#comment-22395</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Surls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/07/26/shocking/#comment-22395</guid>
		<description>The government needs to do a better job of controlling the press to make sure that only information that serves the war effort gets published, and that information (true or false) that doesn&#039;t serve the war effort doesn&#039;t get published.

They also need to censor what soldiers are saying so this kind of stuff never gets into the press in the first place.  Subjecting written comunications, and electronic communications (like e-mails or weblogs) to censorship is only common sense.

If the government can&#039;t figure out how to do this, then they should study the methods employed by Roosevelt and the liberal Democrats in the 1940s.

Love the liberals or hate them, no one can deny that they knew how to employ censorship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The government needs to do a better job of controlling the press to make sure that only information that serves the war effort gets published, and that information (true or false) that doesn&#8217;t serve the war effort doesn&#8217;t get published.</p>
<p>They also need to censor what soldiers are saying so this kind of stuff never gets into the press in the first place.  Subjecting written comunications, and electronic communications (like e-mails or weblogs) to censorship is only common sense.</p>
<p>If the government can&#8217;t figure out how to do this, then they should study the methods employed by Roosevelt and the liberal Democrats in the 1940s.</p>
<p>Love the liberals or hate them, no one can deny that they knew how to employ censorship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corndog</title>
		<link>http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/07/26/shocking/comment-page-1/#comment-22392</link>
		<dc:creator>corndog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 18:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/07/26/shocking/#comment-22392</guid>
		<description>Jeffy says:  &quot;kind of like supporting the troops by printing agitprop against the troops, now that I think upon it. &quot;

So someone says a soldier ran over a dog and someone else made fun of a lady&#039;s face.  Reaction of Jeffy, Surly and other wingers:  &quot;Outrage! Lies!  Get me Centcom!&quot;

Someone shot Pat Tillman three times in the forehead from 10 yards away.  Reaction of Jeffy, Surly and other wingers:  Silence.  Wind sweeping low over the grass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeffy says:  &#8220;kind of like supporting the troops by printing agitprop against the troops, now that I think upon it. &#8221;</p>
<p>So someone says a soldier ran over a dog and someone else made fun of a lady&#8217;s face.  Reaction of Jeffy, Surly and other wingers:  &#8220;Outrage! Lies!  Get me Centcom!&#8221;</p>
<p>Someone shot Pat Tillman three times in the forehead from 10 yards away.  Reaction of Jeffy, Surly and other wingers:  Silence.  Wind sweeping low over the grass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Surls</title>
		<link>http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/07/26/shocking/comment-page-1/#comment-22350</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Surls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/07/26/shocking/#comment-22350</guid>
		<description>“It is my patriotic duty to believe the soldiers of my country never commit atrocities!”

Hell, you liberals pulled out your atomic bombs, and fried a couple of hundred thousand Nips to end WWII.

It&#039;s not like it&#039;s a big secret or anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“It is my patriotic duty to believe the soldiers of my country never commit atrocities!”</p>
<p>Hell, you liberals pulled out your atomic bombs, and fried a couple of hundred thousand Nips to end WWII.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not like it&#8217;s a big secret or anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Real_JeffS</title>
		<link>http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/07/26/shocking/comment-page-1/#comment-22341</link>
		<dc:creator>The_Real_JeffS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/07/26/shocking/#comment-22341</guid>
		<description>Glad to be of assistance, Dave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to be of assistance, Dave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alphie</title>
		<link>http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/07/26/shocking/comment-page-1/#comment-22339</link>
		<dc:creator>alphie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 03:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/07/26/shocking/#comment-22339</guid>
		<description>&quot;It is my patriotic duty to believe the soldiers of my country never commit atrocities!&quot;

Sounds familiar.

Can&#039;t quite...oh, that&#039;s right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It is my patriotic duty to believe the soldiers of my country never commit atrocities!&#8221;</p>
<p>Sounds familiar.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t quite&#8230;oh, that&#8217;s right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Surls</title>
		<link>http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/07/26/shocking/comment-page-1/#comment-22332</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Surls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 02:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/07/26/shocking/#comment-22332</guid>
		<description>&quot;Check out MM..:&quot;

I did.  Thanks.

Like I said...I don&#039;t think this guy is on the up and up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Check out MM..:&#8221;</p>
<p>I did.  Thanks.</p>
<p>Like I said&#8230;I don&#8217;t think this guy is on the up and up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Real_JeffS</title>
		<link>http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/07/26/shocking/comment-page-1/#comment-22306</link>
		<dc:creator>The_Real_JeffS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/07/26/shocking/#comment-22306</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Lastly…why the hell is the army allowing uncensored communications out of a combat theater? Did they get rid of military censors?&lt;/i&gt;

To answer the last first....yes and no.  Those milblogs are scrutinized pretty closely, and offenders reported to their chain of command.  In fact, DoD nearly pulled the plug on all blogging several months ago over this sort of crap.

On the rest.....alas, this is the best way to get the good news out of Iraq, Dave.  God knows the MSM won&#039;t do it.  

Check out MM.....she has an excellent write up on Beauchamp....and it ain&#039;t looking good for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Lastly…why the hell is the army allowing uncensored communications out of a combat theater? Did they get rid of military censors?</i></p>
<p>To answer the last first&#8230;.yes and no.  Those milblogs are scrutinized pretty closely, and offenders reported to their chain of command.  In fact, DoD nearly pulled the plug on all blogging several months ago over this sort of crap.</p>
<p>On the rest&#8230;..alas, this is the best way to get the good news out of Iraq, Dave.  God knows the MSM won&#8217;t do it.  </p>
<p>Check out MM&#8230;..she has an excellent write up on Beauchamp&#8230;.and it ain&#8217;t looking good for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Purple Avenger</title>
		<link>http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/07/26/shocking/comment-page-1/#comment-22302</link>
		<dc:creator>Purple Avenger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/07/26/shocking/#comment-22302</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Ministry of Interior in Iraq has now said a Captain Jamil Hussein does work in the al Khadra police station.&lt;/i&gt;

I had no doubt someone &quot;existed&quot; in a physical sense.  I see the MOI curiously refrained from endorsing the substance of his &quot;stories&quot; though.  The on-the-spot reporting from places far distant from where you&#039;re stationed is really quite amazing isn&#039;t it?

Who would have thought Jamil Hussein was hiding teleportation technology from the rest of the world?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Ministry of Interior in Iraq has now said a Captain Jamil Hussein does work in the al Khadra police station.</i></p>
<p>I had no doubt someone &#8220;existed&#8221; in a physical sense.  I see the MOI curiously refrained from endorsing the substance of his &#8220;stories&#8221; though.  The on-the-spot reporting from places far distant from where you&#8217;re stationed is really quite amazing isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>Who would have thought Jamil Hussein was hiding teleportation technology from the rest of the world?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
