<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Concerns About Stability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/10/06/concerns-about-stability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/10/06/concerns-about-stability/</link>
	<description>Forward Movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:42:01 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bilpu</title>
		<link>http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/10/06/concerns-about-stability/comment-page-1/#comment-31102</link>
		<dc:creator>bilpu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 23:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/10/06/concerns-about-stability/#comment-31102</guid>
		<description>It thrills me to think that part of this operation could have been set up to sting Iran as Section9 ourlines above! Perhaps the concerns about &quot;stability&quot; were nothing more than a way to hold things up until Kim had his money in the bank before Israel went ahead with the next step.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It thrills me to think that part of this operation could have been set up to sting Iran as Section9 ourlines above! Perhaps the concerns about &#8220;stability&#8221; were nothing more than a way to hold things up until Kim had his money in the bank before Israel went ahead with the next step.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanguard of the Commentariat</title>
		<link>http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/10/06/concerns-about-stability/comment-page-1/#comment-31041</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanguard of the Commentariat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/10/06/concerns-about-stability/#comment-31041</guid>
		<description>section 8,  so it sounds like &quot;the dumbest guy in the world boy president&quot; avoided war by some clever behind the scenes manipulations.  I thought that was the whole point of the Left&#039;s kvetching since Sept 12th, 2001.    

The Code Pinkos, human shields and World Workers Party ought to be dancing in the streets!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>section 8,  so it sounds like &#8220;the dumbest guy in the world boy president&#8221; avoided war by some clever behind the scenes manipulations.  I thought that was the whole point of the Left&#8217;s kvetching since Sept 12th, 2001.    </p>
<p>The Code Pinkos, human shields and World Workers Party ought to be dancing in the streets!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Israel&#8217;s Attack on Syria : Minor Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/10/06/concerns-about-stability/comment-page-1/#comment-30991</link>
		<dc:creator>Israel&#8217;s Attack on Syria : Minor Thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 02:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/10/06/concerns-about-stability/#comment-30991</guid>
		<description>[...] Jules Crittenden wonders what kind of stability the State Department was trying to protect. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jules Crittenden wonders what kind of stability the State Department was trying to protect. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: section9</title>
		<link>http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/10/06/concerns-about-stability/comment-page-1/#comment-30966</link>
		<dc:creator>section9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 22:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/10/06/concerns-about-stability/#comment-30966</guid>
		<description>I really believe that a lot of the Usual Suspects on the conservative side of the aisle are buying a planted story like gullible fools. I strongly suspect that this story is a heck of a lot more complex than the narrative that has been presented by the Israelis (or Cheney&#039;s office, whomever are the guys who planted this hit job).

I can buy into the notion that Rice might be cautious about believing intelligence produced by the CIA. Anyone should. Those clowns can&#039;t put the hearse in the right place in a two car funeral. However, there is a missing element to the story that was there earlier: the North Koreans. 

Remember, the Izzies didn&#039;t attack until the North Korean ship docked and the materials got to the Syrian plant, or whatever it was. I strongly suspect that we a being fed a bill of goods to hide or mask the North Korean role in all this to save the Six Party Agreement and allow Kim to walk away with his winnings from a deal that he made with the Iranians. 

Jules, if you want to buy into disinformation, go right ahead, but I suspect that this was manufactured to spare Kim the embarrassment felt by Captain Renaud at &lt;i&gt;Rick&#039;s Cafe Americain&lt;/i&gt; after having been presented with his winnings at the Baccarat Table. This story is a big, shiny pony in which there is no mention of a North Korean ship at all. Only that some of the material might have been North Korean in origin.

Did anyone notice that?

Kim made a deal with the Persians to tranship his enriched uranium to the Persians. We and the Israelis knew about it. Kim knew that we knew. Once he got his cash, he screwed his partners in return for a payoff or some other form of protection. He looks innocent because the Syrians, the middleman on the whole deal, got their finders fee and actually collected the uranium. Unfortunately for the Revolutionary Guards Corps, the Jews showed up and bombed everything and got away with the stuff. Score another victory for the &lt;i&gt;Sayeret Metkal&lt;/i&gt;, imho.

The uranium is either in Damona or at Los Alamos. Kim still has his money. The Boy President is embarrassed that his Russian radars don&#039;t work, but he has his finder&#039;s fee, and the Iranians are out several hundred million dollars. They suck: for the first time in a long time, the Rug Merchants got taken to the cleaners by someone smarter than them-the Koreans.

Eventually, Kim gets diplomatic recognition and a No Regime Change promise. I will bet you the Miami Dolphins First Round draft choice that Kim played ball with us. His price was steep, but he played ball.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really believe that a lot of the Usual Suspects on the conservative side of the aisle are buying a planted story like gullible fools. I strongly suspect that this story is a heck of a lot more complex than the narrative that has been presented by the Israelis (or Cheney&#8217;s office, whomever are the guys who planted this hit job).</p>
<p>I can buy into the notion that Rice might be cautious about believing intelligence produced by the CIA. Anyone should. Those clowns can&#8217;t put the hearse in the right place in a two car funeral. However, there is a missing element to the story that was there earlier: the North Koreans. </p>
<p>Remember, the Izzies didn&#8217;t attack until the North Korean ship docked and the materials got to the Syrian plant, or whatever it was. I strongly suspect that we a being fed a bill of goods to hide or mask the North Korean role in all this to save the Six Party Agreement and allow Kim to walk away with his winnings from a deal that he made with the Iranians. </p>
<p>Jules, if you want to buy into disinformation, go right ahead, but I suspect that this was manufactured to spare Kim the embarrassment felt by Captain Renaud at <i>Rick&#8217;s Cafe Americain</i> after having been presented with his winnings at the Baccarat Table. This story is a big, shiny pony in which there is no mention of a North Korean ship at all. Only that some of the material might have been North Korean in origin.</p>
<p>Did anyone notice that?</p>
<p>Kim made a deal with the Persians to tranship his enriched uranium to the Persians. We and the Israelis knew about it. Kim knew that we knew. Once he got his cash, he screwed his partners in return for a payoff or some other form of protection. He looks innocent because the Syrians, the middleman on the whole deal, got their finders fee and actually collected the uranium. Unfortunately for the Revolutionary Guards Corps, the Jews showed up and bombed everything and got away with the stuff. Score another victory for the <i>Sayeret Metkal</i>, imho.</p>
<p>The uranium is either in Damona or at Los Alamos. Kim still has his money. The Boy President is embarrassed that his Russian radars don&#8217;t work, but he has his finder&#8217;s fee, and the Iranians are out several hundred million dollars. They suck: for the first time in a long time, the Rug Merchants got taken to the cleaners by someone smarter than them-the Koreans.</p>
<p>Eventually, Kim gets diplomatic recognition and a No Regime Change promise. I will bet you the Miami Dolphins First Round draft choice that Kim played ball with us. His price was steep, but he played ball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tanstaafl</title>
		<link>http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/10/06/concerns-about-stability/comment-page-1/#comment-30957</link>
		<dc:creator>tanstaafl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 20:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/10/06/concerns-about-stability/#comment-30957</guid>
		<description>One more story, mea (frigging) culpa for all the links.

You&#039;ve gotta admit that the idea of the failure of Russian built radar systems (&quot;don&#039;t worry, it won&#039;t work&quot;) is appealing.

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3456456,00.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more story, mea (frigging) culpa for all the links.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve gotta admit that the idea of the failure of Russian built radar systems (&#8221;don&#8217;t worry, it won&#8217;t work&#8221;) is appealing.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3456456,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3456456,00.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tanstaafl</title>
		<link>http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/10/06/concerns-about-stability/comment-page-1/#comment-30955</link>
		<dc:creator>tanstaafl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 20:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/10/06/concerns-about-stability/#comment-30955</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Khomenei&lt;/i&gt;

KhAmenei</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Khomenei</i></p>
<p>KhAmenei</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tanstaafl</title>
		<link>http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/10/06/concerns-about-stability/comment-page-1/#comment-30954</link>
		<dc:creator>tanstaafl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 20:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/10/06/concerns-about-stability/#comment-30954</guid>
		<description>This is  interesting.

For the power struggle in Iran that will be on the horizon when the old (reportedly quite unhealthy) America hating Ayotollah Khomenei kicks the bucket.

Iran is hardly a single, unified entity bent on the insane view of chaos, erasure of Israel and the return of the Mahdi.

http://www.pajamasmedia.com/2007/10/sick_on_lehrer.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is  interesting.</p>
<p>For the power struggle in Iran that will be on the horizon when the old (reportedly quite unhealthy) America hating Ayotollah Khomenei kicks the bucket.</p>
<p>Iran is hardly a single, unified entity bent on the insane view of chaos, erasure of Israel and the return of the Mahdi.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pajamasmedia.com/2007/10/sick_on_lehrer.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.pajamasmedia.com/2007/10/sick_on_lehrer.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tanstaafl</title>
		<link>http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/10/06/concerns-about-stability/comment-page-1/#comment-30953</link>
		<dc:creator>tanstaafl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 20:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/10/06/concerns-about-stability/#comment-30953</guid>
		<description>The charade of IAEA and Iranian &quot;peaceful&quot; only nuclear program has been going on for over 2 decades.

Meanwhile, the fact that Iran isn&#039;t apparently yet weapons capable is rather amazing.

(might have been partially all that second rate nuclear &quot;stuff&quot; that Pakistan&#039;s AQ Khan sold them.  I remember when the Iranians complained about that.)

Amir Taheri (Iranian by birth) spells it out:

&lt;i&gt;The revelation that the Islamic Republic began seeking a nuclear deterrent as early as 1988 is nothing new to seasoned Iran-watchers.&lt;/i&gt;

http://www.gulfnews.com/opinion/columns/region/10072055.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The charade of IAEA and Iranian &#8220;peaceful&#8221; only nuclear program has been going on for over 2 decades.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the fact that Iran isn&#8217;t apparently yet weapons capable is rather amazing.</p>
<p>(might have been partially all that second rate nuclear &#8220;stuff&#8221; that Pakistan&#8217;s AQ Khan sold them.  I remember when the Iranians complained about that.)</p>
<p>Amir Taheri (Iranian by birth) spells it out:</p>
<p><i>The revelation that the Islamic Republic began seeking a nuclear deterrent as early as 1988 is nothing new to seasoned Iran-watchers.</i></p>
<p><a href="http://www.gulfnews.com/opinion/columns/region/10072055.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.gulfnews.com/opinion/columns/region/10072055.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/10/06/concerns-about-stability/comment-page-1/#comment-30925</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 09:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/10/06/concerns-about-stability/#comment-30925</guid>
		<description>BTW Jules one of your very best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW Jules one of your very best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/10/06/concerns-about-stability/comment-page-1/#comment-30924</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 09:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/10/06/concerns-about-stability/#comment-30924</guid>
		<description>I like the unrealist policy of screw up and we send in the Marines.

I do believe Iran has screwed up. Big time.

Semper Fi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the unrealist policy of screw up and we send in the Marines.</p>
<p>I do believe Iran has screwed up. Big time.</p>
<p>Semper Fi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
