Comments on: UPDATE MCMLXVIII

By: Wikipedia’s leftist bias keeps deleting information on Glenn Sockpuppet Greenwald’s perfidy « docweaselblog

Sat, 01 Dec 2007 04:37:49 +0000

[...] Jules Crittenden: UPDATE MCMLXVIII [...]

By: Stop The ACLU » Blog Archive » A Few Good Links

Stop The ACLU » Blog Archive » A Few Good Links — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 02:43:51 +0000

[...] at the Gun Nutt on the U.N.’s Gun Control Agenda Jules Crittenden has a lot of fun with a sock puppet named Glenn Greenwald Dread Pundit Bluto has fun with Glenn too. Michelle Malkin with some praise for Tom Tancredo and an [...]

By: Americaneocon

Americaneocon — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 01:15:44 +0000

I’ve torn Greenwald apart in my own posts. I don’t trust a word the guy writes.

Lefties love his stuff of, of course – all the more reason to blast him out of the water.

By: Michelle Malkin » Quote of the afternoon

Michelle Malkin » Quote of the afternoon — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:46:48 +0000

[...] See all the latest developments at Jules Crittenden’s. Posted in: Scott Thomas Beauchamp, Iraq Send to a Friend Printer Friendly comments [...]

By: RebeccaH

RebeccaH — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:23:58 +0000

I love it when Crit pokes things with a stick. All kinds of things flitter and scuttle away.

By: Greenwald…. errr…. Ellensburg, again. | BitsBlog

Greenwald…. errr…. Ellensburg, again. | BitsBlog — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:40:41 +0000

[...] The Jawa Report, Little Green Footballs, Wizbang, Classical Values Jules Crittenden [...]

By: AW1 Tim

AW1 Tim — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:09:10 +0000

Shipmates,

All I know is GiGi hasn’t a clue about how much technical goodness our young men and women posses. He’s been pwned by one (or maybe more) of them, and I suspect there might be more to come, especially driven towards many of the more leftist, idiotarian types in the press and blogosphere.

Eventually, the good folks in the military get tired of being political hocky pucks played by the left (and occasionally the right, sadly) and respond in devilishly clever ways.

It’s likely to get quite interesting in the near future. :)

Respects,

By: The_Real_JeffS

The_Real_JeffS — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:19:43 +0000

Thanks, Mookie….a good point about the double standards of GiGi.

Oh, and it’s nice to see you’re switching sides. At least for now.

By: saltydog

saltydog — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:18:04 +0000

This mouse is being played by one cool cat.

By: mojo

mojo — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:55:14 +0000

The headers, as posted by Gleen (usual caveats):

Return-Path:

Received: from 02exbhizn02.iraq.centcom.mil
(02exbhizn02.iraq.centcom.mil [214.13.200.111]) by rich.salon.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l9SBFSff004148 for ;
Sun, 28 Oct 2007 04:15:36 -0700

Received: from INTZEXEBHIZN01.iraq.centcom.mil ([10.70.20.11]) by 02exbhizn02.iraq.centcom.mil with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Sun, 28 Oct 2007 14:15:05 +0300

Received: from INTZEXEVSIZN02.iraq.centcom.mil ([10.70.20.16]) by INTZEXEBHIZN01.iraq.centcom.mil with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Sun, 28 Oct 2007 14:15:05 +0300

From: “Boylan, Steven COL MNF-I CMD GRP CG PAO”
To: (ggreenwald@salon.com)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Oct 2007 11:15:05.0804 (UTC) FILETIME=[CAF430C0:01C81953]

These look fairly legit, ie: the ip address 214.13.200.111 resolves to “02exbhizn02.iraq.centcom.mil” , so no obvious over-the-net hanky-panky with the sender. So far, then, we’ve established that whoever sent the mail, they were able to send it from a legit centcom.mil mailserver. Any mail admin on the system, or any competent techie working on the system could have sent it. But then, so could the Colonel.

I love this quote, though:

“The IP address — 10.70.20.11 — does not appear to be recognizable from various IP locator programs.”

Uh, maybe because it’s in an non-routable internal-only private IP block? Ya think?

Moron.