Of Moles and Imams
Copenhagen, Denmark
Farouk:
Achmed, have you seen? Upon al-Internet, news of a British writer who is afraid to use the name ‘Mohammed’ in his children’s story lest he be flogged like the woman of the bear in Khartoum!
Achmed, holding his head, world weary:
Another infidel blasphemer? When does it end?
There are not enough hours in the day to condemn them all! Who is this Christian dog who utters slurs against our faith, and what does he write?
Farouk:
He has an infidel name that makes no sense to me, Achmed. Kes-a-garay. His character was to be a mole named Mohammed with a dog named Dipak. Is not Dipak a filthy Hindu name? That seems sensitive enough, that an idol-worshipper should be a Muslim’s dog … Achmed, what is a mole?
Achmed:
It is a mark upon a woman’s cheek, such as is seen upon Marilyn Monroe. Also, the Cindy Crawford. It is entirely inappropriate to bestow the name of the Prophet upon this thing of feminine vanity, which is properly covered from sight with the niqab. It is also possible he is refering to a burrowing rat-like creature which is blind as a beggar. That is slightly less offensive than a woman’s face, but all the same, very culturally insensitive and hurtful! I suppose we must bring a fatwa upon this man.
Farouk:
Fatwa! Does this mean he is to be flogged like the English woman of Khartoum?
Achmed:
No, you donkey! Flogging is for women, and in any case that Mufti of Sudan who is himself no better than a cringing woman has been swayed by the entreaties of the British and will not even flog her. For this man, as a writer who cavorts with Hindus and dreams of insulting the Prophet, a fatwa of death like that upon Rushdie is more appropriate.
Frankly, Farouk, I am a little tired of constantly having to summon up the rage to show the Crusaders the manner in which their thinking is religiously incorrect. Painting all these Danish and British and American flags is tiresome, and there is the hazard of setting oneself on fire. But I suppose it is my jihad.
Farouk:
Achmed, it says here this man was attempting to be sensitive and inclusive, so all the children of the world might enjoy his tales, no matter their religion or their ethnicity, that they may learn to love and respect one another all the same. He seeks to make the world better, to bring an end to hatred and distrust.
Is it not wrong to place a fatwa of death upon such a man? Perhaps, if we love our fellow man, it is not necessary to do more than open our arms to him, and live in oneness.
Achmed:
Don’t be ridiculous, Farouk. Have you been chewing khat? It is bad enough that this pig of a ferenghi blasphemes by choosing to name a woman’s blemish after the Prophet, then he places it in the company of a dog of a Hindu, all in furtherance of an absurd and shameful moral equivalence. It is as though to suggest Islam is no better than the lowest of infidel cultures. Clearly, if we are to restore any sense of lawfulness, order and dignity in the face of this affront, we must burn the British embassy. Bother! Now hand me that flag paint. Let’s see, Britain … many dhimmi crosses of red and white upon blue. OK. I would like you to start making some signs of protest. You had some good ones before. “Freedom Go To Hell.” That was good. “Behead Those Who Insult Islam.” Also good.
Previously:
Pork-Gobbling Crusader Dog Starts Blogging
Topics: Al Stooges of Three
Posted by Jules Crittenden at 11:50 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2007
9 Responses to “Of Moles and Imams”
Leave a Reply
Trackback URLYou must be logged in to post a comment.
December 3rd, 2007 at 2:47 am
The real question is how can any infidel insult Islam as deeply, and permanently as the Muslims have.
December 3rd, 2007 at 8:46 am
Yeah,
What Robert said. I suspect a great portion of these actions by the “Religion of Perpetual Outrage” would stop if those perpetrators were treated to the same mocking derision that Christians and Jews are…
Seriously, it’s like having an entire religion made up of 5-year olds with guns.
December 3rd, 2007 at 10:37 am
Without Ali there can be no Al Stooges of 3!
Return Ali to his rightful place or face the righteous wrath of the umma!
December 3rd, 2007 at 10:52 am
Gee, Muslims in Great Britain have been selling Adam the Muslim Prayer Bear for three years !
“to raise money for charity” (and stuff)
…10,000 teddies, named Adam the Muslim Prayer Bear, were reportedly bought by Muslim families in Britain to raise money for Sudanese refugees. Adam bear’s name is that of another prophet of Islam and at £ 15 a piece, he recites Assalam-o-alaikum when his paws are pressed.
The bears, marketed by the Islamic Society of Britain, to raise funds for charity, have not sparked unease or complaints in the three years they have been sold.
An insult to Christianity’s Adam !
Off with their heads !
December 3rd, 2007 at 12:21 pm
“Adam bear’s name is that of another prophet of Islam”
Yeah. Adam Bear is one of my all time favorite Muslims. He’s right up there with Sheik Yerbouti.
December 3rd, 2007 at 1:36 pm
Muslims certainly exhibit a lot of awkwardness around stuffed animals: Muhammed the Bear, Farfour the Mutant Mouse. Maybe they should just stick to giving their kids toy AK-47s.
December 3rd, 2007 at 6:13 pm
Maybe they should just stick to giving their kids toy AK-47s.
Pictures of very small children (3 YO or so) wearing suicide belts in Gaza.
What sane individual who do such a thing to a child ?
December 3rd, 2007 at 6:14 pm
who
would
December 3rd, 2007 at 7:52 pm
Tanstaafl,
You are talking about Palestinian Arabs, so the question of sanity does not arise. That is a whole society of incandescently insane custardheads.