LibCons vs. TradCons
Examined and postulated upon by RealClearPolitics’ Kevin Sullivan, now sub-blogging at MVDG’s going centrist concern, Poligazette.
Posted by Jules Crittenden at 10:30 am Comments (4) on Thursday, January 3, 2008
4 Responses to “LibCons vs. TradCons”
Leave a Reply
Trackback URLYou must be logged in to post a comment.


January 3rd, 2008 at 12:13 pm
There needs to be a third party. A freedom from coercion party. The Freedom Party. Our symbol wouldn’t be a donkey or an elephant, but Patrick Henry.
January 3rd, 2008 at 1:52 pm
Rudy holds no such reservations, and if victorious, he will have cleverly convinced a party preoccupied with terrorism and security to give liberalism another chance.
But what does that mean? I used to think of myself as fairly liberal on social matters, but I don’t know what liberalism is anymore. The lunatic left have hijacked everything.
January 3rd, 2008 at 4:28 pm
Thats cuz you were probably a classical liberal RebeccaH, like I suspect most of the commenters here are. Individual rights, rule of law, free markets, the stuff that made America the best. Those concepts were pushed to the political “right” , I dunno, sometime in the 60’s when “rights” became something somebody else owed you.
January 3rd, 2008 at 7:06 pm
Point taken, VotC. Therefore, while 9/11 changed some things forever for me, my basic attitude did not change.