No Money No Honey
Here’s what purports to be the alleged hooker’s putative ambulance chaser’s letter.
As I look at his argument, I’m less convinced the hooker has a serious case. After all, the hooker was admittedly engaged in criminal activity, and as I recall, it wasn’t a big secret in the e-bordello who this john was, and the john being who the john was, everything kicks up a notch. The photos were out there in a public venue, where she put them. And suggestiveness has everything to do with the story. That’s for lawyers, and maybe judges and juries to sort out. And if it gets to that, I can assure you, it will have more to do with which side the jury and the judges end up liking better than it will with the law.
In any case, it’s not so much about privacy, or any kind of principle. Let’s face it, the woman is, according to news reports, a hooker. Can’t put the genie back in the bottle. That makes it about money. Which makes this, essentially, a shakedown letter. And the hooker, and her ambulance chaser, have enough of a toehold in the law that they might require go-away money.
It’s a very complicated issue, this awkward case of the rented mule that failed to pay a whore. But none of that changes the most pressing issue, which is that the rented mule in question would appear to be a big fat hypocrite.
Snapped Shot re same here.
Topics: America, media, pols, sex
Posted by Jules Crittenden at 11:29 pm on Sunday, March 16, 2008
Leave a Reply
Trackback URLYou must be logged in to post a comment.
