Campaign Scrawls
I always thought handwriting analysis reeks of psycho-babble, and this article on the presidential candidates is no exception. Who knows, maybe it works, another expression of personality … the “graphologists” cited below are “court-certified,” whatever that means … though it’s hard to think in the case of these well-known specimens that some reading in isn’t taking place. LA Times:
WASHINGTON — Now that the presidential contest is looking ever more like a two-man race, the country can’t help but marvel: John McCain, once a longshot, wouldn’t lie down. Barack Obama, the new kid, charmed voters. And Hillary Rodham Clinton, an early favorite, has yet to surrender.
But Arlyn J. Imberman would say clues to the nomination fight were in plain sight, every time a candidate wrote a thank-you note, inscribed a memoir or autographed a pair of boxing gloves.
“Obama is very much his writing — fluid, graceful. McCain’s is angular and intense; he’s a pit bull. And look at the perfectionism in Hillary’s — straight up, precise. She is persistent and is not going to give up until she absolutely has to,” said Imberman, a court-certified graphologist based in New York.
… three court-certified graphologists gleaned the following by looking at writing samples from Obama, Clinton and McCain:
Despite the charges of elitism flying around, none of the 2008 presidential candidates is a snob. Equally encouraging, all of them appear intelligent and driven.
But two, the experts said, strive to remain opaque amid the public glare. Two are reluctant to embrace their family legacies. One lacks warmth, whereas another can talk to almost anyone. One is flexible, another controlled, the third a loose cannon.
The graphologists analyzed signatures and writing samples from the three candidates — thank-you notes from Clinton and Obama and book pages inscribed by McCain.
Despite vast policy differences, McCain and Obama have something in common signature-wise — illegibility, which suggests a need for privacy or an aversion to transparency.
In McCain’s case, that desire can be seen further in his H, which is not a loop, but an upward stroke overlapped by a downward one. “There is a lot about John McCain he doesn’t wish to share openly,” said Roger Rubin, a New York graphologist with three decades of experience.
“When you cover a stroke, it means you are hiding something,” Rubin said.
Both men’s signatures also reflect a desire to distance themselves from their fathers, the experts said.
Obama was 2 when his father left the family, and McCain’s, a respected Navy admiral, was often absent. That shows up in the emphasis they give their first names — symbols of their personal achievements rather than the legacies to which they were born. Look at the J in John and the B in Barack — each larger than the M in McCain and the O in Obama.
Clinton’s signature is readable, but lacks emotion and warmth — the two Ls in Hillary are sticks rather than loops. The simplicity shows intellect and forcefulness. Her husband’s signature, a bulbous, curvaceous scrawl, is rounder and more feminine. (Hence the gender-reversal thing.)
The body of one’s writing can be revealing because, unlike the practiced brand of a signature, it is spontaneous and unconscious. Together they form a psychological snapshot, graphologists say.
Clinton’s style is upright and controlled. The I’s are dotted and the Ts are crossed. “She can see both sides and would be good at sorting out conflicts,” said Sheila Lowe, a Ventura graphologist and author of “Handwriting of the Famous and Infamous.”
Clinton reduces things to their simplest form, Rubin said. “She goes easily to the core of a subject. But she can be impolitic and impatient with people who don’t get it,” he said.
A thank-you note written by Obama after his win in Iowa reflects intelligence, Rubin asserted, but with emotion and a capacity for conversation. The letters connect fluidly without interruption; words end with lines that reach out. “That’s why the guy can stand up on a podium and talk extemporaneously. It reflects in his writing — the ability to think many thoughts ahead,” Rubin said.
Whereas Clinton’s writing is disciplined, Obama’s is flexible. (Her universal health insurance plan is mandatory; his is optional.) His more limber style suggests a desire to deal with different people. (He favors open dialogue with America’s enemies; she doesn’t.)
By contrast, McCain’s writing is disconnected, forceful and intense. The letters change direction unexpectedly — fitting for a loose cannon, the Republican Party maverick who bucked the establishment. “The writing leans to the right. But he does it in his own way. He doesn’t do what is expected,” Rubin noted.
The H in John stands tall, a sign of pride, idealism and ambition. “He pushes very hard to get what he wants,” Imberman said. “Look at the comma: It’s a slash. There is his temper.”
So if the experts are right, Clinton really is smart and tough and stays until the last dog dies, Obama is an engaging bridge-builder, and McCain takes charge, and does it his way.
Case closed? Hardly: “Handwriting tells a lot of important things, but it doesn’t tell everything,” Lowe cautioned. “People are too complex.”
My quick take, based on a glance at those scribbles up there. I may have read a little in:
John McCain writes pretty well for a guy who was strung up by the North Vietnamese for five years.
Hillary’s oddly looks like it’s missing the smiley face over the i. Think Tracy Flick, “Election.”
Obama’s, well, I hate to read anything in, but I’m getting used car salesman, all bluff and smiles, easy terms, watch out for the fine print.
Topics: pols
Posted by Jules Crittenden at 10:03 am on Tuesday, May 13, 2008
2 Responses to “Campaign Scrawls”
Leave a Reply
Trackback URLYou must be logged in to post a comment.
rx pills online natural tenuate where to buy purchase levitra online cialis cheap Triarese ed pharmacy order diazepam visit your doctor online cheapest valium price buy viagra klipal mail order purchase xanax online female lorazepam cream which works better oxazepam or oxazepam women does zyban work cialis soft tabs women buy cheap viagra oils for female viagra female uk cialis buy discount levitra online uk levitra discount viagra soft tabs online porn movies mexico pharmacy generic viagra soft tabs generic levitra cheapest purchase cialis herbal cialis soft tabs drugstore canada online pharmacy viagra on line cialis natural levitra buy online pharmacy viagra cialis order best price for generic cialis soft tabs viagra soft tabs female opinion order viagra prescription


May 13th, 2008 at 11:50 am
Excellent take, Jules, and probably spot on.
May 13th, 2008 at 5:53 pm
Wow! I can’t wait to find out what the court-certified phrenologists think!