Blood For Oil

Sounds like the Bush-Blair era is officially over. Times of London: Britain sent back the Lockerbie bomber to curry favor in a Libyan-BP oil deal.

Remember when the United States and Britain used to make murderous, terrorism-supporting dictators tremble? They even made Moammar Ghadafi cry uncle and the Iranians bring their nuke program to a temporary halt back in 2003, when they took out Saddam. It was another time, when people used to say it was all about blood for oil. We didn’t actually get any oil for that blood. But in a new, gentler time, apparently it’s possible to swap mass murderers for oil. Think of the possibilities.

Topics: Britain, Libya, terrorists

  Posted by Jules Crittenden at 7:53 am on Sunday, August 30, 2009

4 Responses to “Blood For Oil”

  1. RebeccaH Says:

    How long do you think it will be before ol’ Moammar gins up his nuclear program again?

  2. Blood for Oil in the age of Hopium [Darleen Click] Says:

    [...] to Jules Crittenden who points out that under Bush-Blair we didn’t ever get “Blood for Oil”: But in a [...]

  3. Never Yet Melted » “Blood For Oil” Says:

    [...] Jules Crittenden comments on the not-wholly-unexpected confirmation via a leak to the Times of London that, yes, Virginia, the Labour Government really did trade the Lockerbie bomber for a BP oil deal. [...]

  4. So Where’s The Anti-War Protesters? « Tai-Chi Policy Says:

    [...] I hear? Not so much anti-war as much as on the other side. And how do all you security voters feel? Obama sure is doing his part to keep us all safer, [...]

Leave a Reply

Trackback URL

You must be logged in to post a comment.