Comments on: The Kennedy Seat

By: The Kennedy Seat « Don Surber

The Kennedy Seat « Don Surber — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:02:18 +0000

[...] Jules Crittenden reports about the political incest in that backward state of Massachusetts. [...]

By: GHS159

GHS159 — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:58:31 +0000

I think Picard would have been a better pick.

On a serious note, it seems that MA has been all but abandoned by the RNC. I’ve told people for a while now that the party needs to be rebuilt from the ground up, it does no good to try to go after statewide offices without a pool of viable Republican candidates.

Then again, saveliberty has a point about a third party. If not now, when?

By: Jules Crittenden, Retired Lobbyist With Close Ties To Big Pharma Gets The Kennedy Seat « Mcnorman’s Weblog

Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:32:37 +0000

[...] pharmaceutical industry, retired, senator, special interests, ted kennedy | Leave a Comment Jules Crittenden » The Kennedy Seat. It’s his deep ties to the insurance and pharmaceutical industries, plus whoever else he’s [...]

By: mwl

mwl — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:54:23 +0000

I prefer “vassal” as the proper word to describe Kirk’s relationship with the Kennedys. I think that would aptly describe the Kennedys’ self-regard and sense of entitlement.

It’s been the Kennedy seat for 56 years, time for some fresh blood.

By: Daily Pundit » So Much For That

Daily Pundit » So Much For That — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:02:54 +0000

[...] Jules Crittenden » The Kennedy Seat I don’t know who died and made that a Kennedy seat … oh, excuse me, is this mike on? [...]

By: TheBigHenry

TheBigHenry — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:02:26 +0000

Consider what a prize of being a contender for the so-called Kennedy seat would be (instead of taking a dive before the first round begins).

By: saveliberty

saveliberty — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:43:14 +0000

Jules, the RNC in Massachusetts has been a big disappointment.

At this point, a Tea Party organization would be welcome. I have friends here who self-identify as liberals, but also advocate what would be hailed as conservative policies. I think it’s fair to say that if MA-R = liberal light, why shouldn’t voters go for the real thing? There’s severe knee-twitching when R is mentioned and that would be why.

The problem is that the financial, not social issues, would bring more conservatives together and fix this mess.